Administrative
Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Company, Inc., et al.; and Japan-Atlantic and Gulf Freight Conference et al. v. United States et al.
353 U.S. 908·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 739.
No. 740.
Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Company, Inc., et al.; and Japan-Atlantic and Gulf Freight Conference et al. v. United States et al.
Edward D. Ransom and Edward Aptaker for petitioner in No. 739. James M. Landis, Seymour J. Rubin, Herman Goldman, Elkan Turk, Benjamin Wiener and Elkan Turk, Jr. for petitioners in No. 740. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States and the Secretary of Agriculture, and John J. O’Connor and John J. O’Connor, Jr. for the Isbrandtsen Company, Inc., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.
Reported below: 99 U. S. App. D. C. 312, 239 F. 2d 933.