Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Jim BAKER, Appellant, 1975 — 526 F.2d 804 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Jim BAKER, Appellant
526 F.2d 804·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1975
Before ROSS, STEPHENSON and WEBSTER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Jim BAKER, Appellant.
No. 75-1552.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 10, 1975.
Decided Dec. 18, 1975.
Hale W. Brown, Kirkwood, Mo., for appellant.
Frederick Buckles, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.
Before ROSS, STEPHENSON and WEBSTER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Jim Baker appeals from his conviction for dealing in firearms without a license, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(1) and 924(a). He contends that government agents entrapped him and that the evidence was insufficient for conviction.
Baker was tried before the Honorable H. Kenneth Wangelin, whose findings of fact and conclusions of law are reported in United States v. Baker, 397 F.Supp. 1122 (E.D.Mo.1975). Finding no error in those proceedings, we affirm on the basis of Judge Wangelin’s memorandum opinion.