Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Samuel McRickard, Appellant, v. George C. Flint et al., Respondents, 1884 — 97 N.Y. 641 · caselaw · US
General
Samuel McRickard, Appellant, v. George C. Flint et al., Respondents
97 N.Y. 641·New York Court of Appeals·1884·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel McRickard, Appellant, v. George C. Flint et al., Respondents.
(Argued October 29, 1884;
decided November 25, 1884.)
Decided on the facts.
Leopold Turk for appellant.
Artemus H. Holmes for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
mem. for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judment reversed.