Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Fred Harding, Respondent, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. George W. Evans, Appellant, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 583 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of Fred Harding, Respondent, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. George W. Evans, Appellant
188 N.Y. 583·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Fred Harding, Respondent, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. George W. Evans, Appellant.
(Argued April 1, 1907;
decided April 16, 1907.)
Matter of Harding, 112 App. Div. 907, affirmed.
, Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 26, 1906, which affirmed an order of the Ulster County Court discharging the petitioner, a judgment debtor, from custody.
Charles II. Stage for appellant.
Joseph M. Fowler for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, IIiscock and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Cüllen, Ch. J., Haight and Vann, JJ. _