Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Embry Brothers, Inc., et al. v. Davis et al., 1959 — 360 U.S. 910 · caselaw · US
General
Embry Brothers, Inc., et al. v. Davis et al.
360 U.S. 910·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 883.
Embry Brothers, Inc., et al. v. Davis et al.
Ralph H. Logan for Embry Brothers, Inc., petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and A. F. Prescott for the United States, and Charles I: Dawson for Citizens Fidelity Bank & Trust Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.