Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel P. McConnell, 1915 — 239 U.S. 633 · caselaw · US
General
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel P. McConnell
239 U.S. 633·Supreme Court of the United States·1915
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 119.
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel P. McConnell.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina.
Argued December 8 and 9, 1915.
Decided December 13, 1915.
Mr. Walter H. Neal for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. S. S. Gregory for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672, 677; New Orleans & N. E. R. R. v. National Rice Milling Co., 234 U. S. 80, 86; Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S., ante, p. 134.