Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John M. Bemis et al., Appellants, v. Collis P. Huntington, Respondent, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 670 · caselaw · US
General
John M. Bemis et al., Appellants, v. Collis P. Huntington, Respondent
153 N.Y. 670·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John M. Bemis et al., Appellants, v. Collis P. Huntington, Respondent.
Bemis v. Huntington, 15 App. Div. 627, appeal dismissed.
(Argued June 7, 1897;
decided June 22, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 29, 1897, which dismissed an appeal from an order of Special Term granting a motion for an order of interpleader.
Edward Hassett for appellants.
Maawell Evarts for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Gbay, J., absent.