Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Patrick Sheahan, Appellant, v. The National Steamship Company (Limited), Respondent, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 655 · caselaw · US
General
Patrick Sheahan, Appellant, v. The National Steamship Company (Limited), Respondent
142 N.Y. 655·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Patrick Sheahan, Appellant, v. The National Steamship Company (Limited), Respondent.
(Argued April 13, 1894;
decided May 1, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made December 18,1892, which overruled plaintiff’s exceptions to the rulings of the judge at Circuit, who dismissed the complaint and granted a new trial.
Dermis Sheahan for appellant.
John Ohetwood for respondent.
Reported below, 66 Hun, 48.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.