Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Robert Fitch Shepard et al., Respondents, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants, 1895 — 147 N.Y. 703 · caselaw · US
General
Robert Fitch Shepard et al., Respondents, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants
147 N.Y. 703·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert Fitch Shepard et al., Respondents, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants.
Mem. of decision below, 9 Misc. Rep. 727.
(Argued October 8, 1895;
decided October 22, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered upon an order made July 10, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at an Equity Term. »
Brainard Tolies for appellants.
JE. W. Tyler for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.