Contracts · MBE-tested

JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES

401 U.S. 84691 S. Ct. 1258·Supreme Court of the United States·1971

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. · with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins,

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES No. 5247. Argued March 24, 1971 Decided April 5, 1971 William J. Lippman, by appointment of the Court, 400 U. S. 940, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Samuel Huntington argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Roger A. Pauley. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [DISSENT — Mr. Justice Stewart,] Mr. Justice Stewart, with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins, dissenting. In the petitioner’s trial on a charge of rape, the District Judge instructed the jury that it could return a verdict of guilty with the death penalty. Yet that verdict was constitutionally impermissible in light of this Court’s decision in United States v. Jackson, 390 U. S. 570. See Bailey v. United States, 132 U. S. App. D. C. 82, 86 and n. 3, 405 P. 2d 1352, 1356 and n. 3. I think the extreme prejudice arising from this erroneous instruction requires reversal of the judgment of conviction and a remand of this case for a new trial. Cf. Price v. Georgia, 398 U. S. 323, 331-332.