Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
TOBIAN TIRE & BATTERY COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. KELLY-SPRINGFIELD TIRE COMPANY, Defendant in Error, 1928 — 22 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
TOBIAN TIRE & BATTERY COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. KELLY-SPRINGFIELD TIRE COMPANY, Defendant in Error
22 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
TOBIAN TIRE & BATTERY COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. KELLY-SPRINGFIELD TIRE COMPANY, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 6, 1928.
No. 5174.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; Wm. H. Atwell, Judge.
Dexter Hamilton, of Dallas, Tex. (Cockrell, McBride, O’Donnell & Hamilton, of Dallas, Tex., on the brief), for plaintiffs in error.
William Lipscomb, of Dallas, Tex. (Seay, Seay, Malone & Lipscomb, of Dallas, Tex., on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
Rehearing denied February 1, 1923.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.