Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William H. McWhirter, Respondent, v. Abner T. Bowen et al., Appellants. Alvin Eisert, Respondent, Impleaded with Another, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 516 · caselaw · US
General
William H. McWhirter, Respondent, v. Abner T. Bowen et al., Appellants. Alvin Eisert, Respondent, Impleaded with Another
187 N.Y. 516·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. McWhirter, Respondent, v. Abner T. Bowen et al., Appellants. Alvin Eisert, Respondent, Impleaded with Another.
McWhirter v. Bowen, 103 App. Div. 447, affirmed.
(Submitted December 10, 1906 ;
decided January 8, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 23, 1906, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered up on a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to enforce a written agreement and for an accounting.
Henry B. Johnson, William L. Marshall and John J. Cunneen for appellants.
James M. Fisk for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.