Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Flora A. Taylor, Appellant, v. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen of the State of New York, Respondent, 1896 — 148 N.Y. 751 · caselaw · US
General
Flora A. Taylor, Appellant, v. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen of the State of New York, Respondent
148 N.Y. 751·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Flora A. Taylor, Appellant, v. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen of the State of New York, Respondent.
Mem. of decision below, 75 Hun, 612.
(Argued January 29, 1896;
decided February 18, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered February 17, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered "upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit.
John H. White for appellant.
A. G. Harwich for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with, costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Haight, J., not sitting.