Tax
Nora KAHN and German Kahn, as Ex'rs, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Frank K. BOWERS, as Collector, etc., Defendant in Error
9 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nora KAHN and German Kahn, as Ex’rs, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Frank K. BOWERS, as Collector, etc., Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 17, 1925.)
No. 156.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Rosenblum & Sommer, of New York City, for plaintiffs in error.
Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Sherwood E. Hall, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Thomas H. Lewis, Jr., Sp. Atty. Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.
Before HOUGH, HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PEE CURIAM.]
PEE CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed in open court.