Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Minnie B. Landon, Respondent, v. The Preferred Accident Insurance Company of New York, Appellant, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 609 · caselaw · US
General
Minnie B. Landon, Respondent, v. The Preferred Accident Insurance Company of New York, Appellant
162 N.Y. 609·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Minnie B. Landon, Respondent, v. The Preferred Accident Insurance Company of New York, Appellant.
Reported below, 43 App. Div. 487.
(Argued February 36, 1900;
decided March 6, 1900.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October % 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The motion was made upon the grounds that this court is without jurisdiction to hear the appeal, that the judgment of the Appellate Division was unanimous, and, therefore, not appealable1 to this court, and that the exceptions taken are frivolous.
William S. Lewis for motion.
George E. Cooney, opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with ten dollars costs.