Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Julius Lipman et al., Respondents, v. William A. Mathesius, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1894 — 143 N.Y. 640 · caselaw · US
General
Julius Lipman et al., Respondents, v. William A. Mathesius, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
143 N.Y. 640·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julius Lipman et al., Respondents, v. William A. Mathesius, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued June 18, 1894;
decided June 22, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of Mew York, made Movember 11, 1892, which affirmed an order of Special Term. confirming the report of a referee appointed in proceedings for the distribution of surplus moneys.
H. B. C losson for appellant.
E. A. Jacob for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.