General
Jack N. CASAVIS, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
2 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jack N. CASAVIS, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 14, 1924.)
No. 52.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Stephen B. Vreeland and Furman, Thayer & Vreeland, all of New York City, for plaintiff in error.
William Hayward, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Elmer H. Lemon, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., of Middleton, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed in open court.