Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, petitioner, v. Matthew KOBOLD., 2015 — 135 S. Ct. 2886 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, petitioner, v. Matthew KOBOLD.
135 S. Ct. 2886192 L. Ed. 2d 918·Supreme Court of the United States·2015
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
Matthew KOBOLD.
No. 13-1467.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 29, 2015.
Opinion
[MAJORITY]
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, for further consideration in light of new regulations promulgated by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). See OPM, Final Rule, Federal Employees Health Benefits Program; Subrogation and Reimbursement Recovery,80 Fed.Reg. 29,203 (May 21, 2015)(5 C.F.R. 890.106).