Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John H. GLASS, Trustee in Bankruptcy of J. Willard NIXON, Individually and as Surviving Partner of the Partnership of Cadigan, Nixon & Company, Appellant, v. John CUMMING, Jr., Appellee; John CUMMING, Jr., Petitioner Below and Cross-Appellant, v. John H. GLASS, Trustee in Bankruptcy of J. Willard Nixon, Individually and as Surviving Partner of the Partnership of Cadigan, Nixon & Company, Respondent Below and Cross-Appellee, 1930 — 39 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
John H. GLASS, Trustee in Bankruptcy of J. Willard NIXON, Individually and as Surviving Partner of the Partnership of Cadigan, Nixon & Company, Appellant, v. John CUMMING, Jr., Appellee; John CUMMING, Jr., Petitioner Below and Cross-Appellant, v. John H. GLASS, Trustee in Bankruptcy of J. Willard Nixon, Individually and as Surviving Partner of the Partnership of Cadigan, Nixon & Company, Respondent Below and Cross-Appellee
39 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John H. GLASS, Trustee in Bankruptcy of J. Willard NIXON, Individually and as Surviving Partner of the Partnership of Cadigan, Nixon & Company, Appellant, v. John CUMMING, Jr., Appellee. John CUMMING, Jr., Petitioner Below and Cross-Appellant, v. John H. GLASS, Trustee in Bankruptcy of J. Willard Nixon, Individually and as Surviving Partner of the Partnership of Cadigan, Nixon & Company, Respondent Below and Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 4151, 4266.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
April 16, 1930.
G. G. Martin, of Franklin, Pa., Owen J. Roberts, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Albert L. Thomas, of Meadville, Pa., for Glass.
Eugene Mackey, of Franklin, Pa., for Cumming, Jr.
Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and THOMSON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In the report of the special master filed in this case, exceptions were filed by both parties, and, on hearing before the court, all the exceptions were dismissed and the report confirmed. From the judgment and decree so entered, both parties appealed. After full consideration of the cases, we are of opinion that both appeals should be dismissed; the appellant in each case to pay the costs of such appeal. .
In the appeal of John Cumming, Jr., he is directed to pay the costs accruing before the master in his reclamation proceedings and counsel fees in the sum of $-. Subject to this modification, the judgment and decree of the court below is affirmed. In case the parties do not, before the mandate goes down, agree on the amount of such fee, then and in that event the fixation of the fee will be made by the court below.