Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Superior Films, Inc. v. Department of Education of Ohio, Division of Film Censorship, Hissong, Superintendent, 1953 — 346 U.S. 809 · caselaw · US
General
Superior Films, Inc. v. Department of Education of Ohio, Division of Film Censorship, Hissong, Superintendent
346 U.S. 809·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 217.
Superior Films, Inc. v. Department of Education of Ohio, Division of Film Censorship, Hissong, Superintendent.
Francis J. Wright, Michael Oesas, Earl F. Morris and John C. Harlor for appellant. C. William O’Neill, Attorney General of Ohio, Robert E. Leach, Chief Counsel, and Gwynne B. Myers, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Ohio. Probable jurisdiction noted.