Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry MONTGOMERY, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA., 2015 — 136 S. Ct. 6 · caselaw · US
General
Henry MONTGOMERY, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.
136 S. Ct. 6192 L. Ed. 2d 995·Supreme Court of the United States·2015
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry MONTGOMERY, petitioner,
v.
LOUISIANA.
No. 14-280.
Supreme Court of the United States
Sep. 14, 2015.
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motion of the parties and the Court-appointed amicus curiae for enlargement of time for oral argument and for divided argument granted, and the time is divided as follows: 15 minutes for the Court-appointed amicus curiae, 15 minutes for the petitioner, 15 minutes for the Solicitor General, and 30 minutes for the respondent. The Court-appointed amicus curiae and the petitioner will each be permitted to reserve time for rebuttal.