Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William J. Williams, Appellant v. Helen Egbert, Respondent, 1873 — 54 N.Y. 676 · caselaw · US
General
William J. Williams, Appellant v. Helen Egbert, Respondent
54 N.Y. 676·New York Commission of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William J. Williams, Appellant v. Helen Egbert, Respondent.
(Submitted June 20, 1873;
decided September term, 1873.)
Decided, on opinion of Tappan, J., at General Term.
Daniel S. Walden for the appellant.
C. & T. Perry for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Mem. per Curiam for affirmance, on opinion of Tappan, J., below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.