Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sharp v. Pettit, 1800 — 4 U.S. 185 · caselaw · US
General
Sharp v. Pettit
4 U.S. 1854 Dall. 185·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1800·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sharp v. Pettit.
Dower.
No damages or costs are recoverable, in dower, where the husband did not die seised.
Writ of Dower. The inquisition stated, that the husband did not die seised of the premises; and found damages for the detention of dower, with costs.
JRoss moved to quash the inquisition, so far as respects the damages and costs.
s. c. 3 Yeates 38.
Benner v. Evans, 3 P. & W. 454; Barnet v. Barnet, 15 S. & R. 72; Leineweaver v. Stoever, 17 Id. 297.
[MAJORITY — By the Court.]
By the Court.
— It must be so ; but let judgment be entered for the lemandant, without damages or costs.