General
Frank T. HINES, Director of the United States Veterans' Bureau, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. Clyde V. BERGLUND; Frank T. HINES, Director of the United States Veterans' Bureau, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. Edward T. FERGUSON; Frank T. HINES, Director of the United States Veterans' Bureau, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. Bayard BROOKS
48 F.2d 1067·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank T. HINES, Director of the United States Veterans’ Bureau, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. Clyde V. BERGLUND. Frank T. HINES, Director of the United States Veterans’ Bureau, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. Edward T. FERGUSON. Frank T. HINES, Director of the United States Veterans’ Bureau, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. Bayard BROOKS.
Nos. 5198-5200.
Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Argued April 6, 1931.
Decided May 4, 1931.
Leo A. Rover, John W. Fihelly, James T. Brady, and A. Hinderliter, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
S. T. Ansell, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, HITZ, arid GRONER, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
It is conceded that these appeals respectively raise the same issue as'that decided by us this day in the appeal of Frank T. Hines, Director of the United States Veterans’ Bureau, Appellant, v. United States ex rel. Harry V. Fisher, 60 App. D. C. 1113, 48 F.(2d) 1067.
In conformity with our decision in that case, the judgments of the lower court in these eases are reversed, and the causes are remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.