Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WADE v. YEAGER, WARDEN, 1968 — 392 U.S. 661 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
WADE v. YEAGER, WARDEN
392 U.S. 66120 L. Ed. 2d 1352·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Black dissents. · Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for reasons stated in Mr. Justice White's dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WADE v. YEAGER, WARDEN.
No. 857,
Misc.
Decided June 17, 1968.
John G. Thevos for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123.
Mr. Justice Black dissents.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for reasons stated in Mr. Justice White's dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).