Contracts · MBE-tested
Zap v. United States
326 U.S. 802·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 489.
Zap v. United States.
January 7, 1946.
Mr. Morris Lavine for petitioner.
Solicitor General McGrath, Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl, Walter I. Cummings, Jr. and Miss Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for rehearing is granted and the order entered December 10th denying certiorari, 326 U. S. 777, is vacated. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is granted limited to the question whether books and records relating to the petitioner’s contract with the Navy Department were properly admitted as evidence at his trial.