Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Myron RETZKY et al. v. UNITED STATES of America, 1933 — 64 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Myron RETZKY et al. v. UNITED STATES of America
64 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Myron RETZKY et al. v. UNITED STATES of America.
No. 4747.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
April 12, 1933.
K. B. Czarnecki, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Edward A. Fisher, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Now this day come the parties by their counsel, and this cause now comes on to be heard on the printed record and briefs of counsel and on oral arguments by K. B. Czar-necki, counsel for appellant, and by Edward A. Fisher, counsel for appellee.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division in this cause be, and the same is hereby affirmed. It is further ordered that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.