Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Radio Corporation of America et al. v. United States et al., 1951 — 340 U.S. 957 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Radio Corporation of America et al. v. United States et al.
340 U.S. 957·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 565.
Radio Corporation of America et al. v. United States et al.
John T. Cahill, Simon H. Rif-kind, B. C. Schiff, John J. Kelly, Jr., Frank S. Righeimer, Jr., Alfred Kamin and Gerald Ratner for appellants. Solicitor General Perlman, Stanley M. Silverberg, Benedict P. Cottone, Max Goldman, Samuel I. Rosenman and Richard S. Salant for appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Upon consideration of the motion of the appellants for an extension of the stay granted by the District Court, it is ordered that the order of the Federal Communications Commission entered herein be, and the same is hereby, stayed pending the issuance of the mandate of this Court.