Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SHELL OIL CO. v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CALIFORNIA et al., 1967 — 386 U.S. 211 · caselaw · US
General
SHELL OIL CO. v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CALIFORNIA et al.
386 U.S. 211·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SHELL OIL CO. v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CALIFORNIA et al.
No. 863.
Decided February 27, 1967.
Robert D. Mackenzie for appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney ¾ General of California,James E. Sabine and Ernest P. Goodman, Assistant Attorneys General, and John J. Klee, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.