Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George V. Hartmann et al., Respondents, v. Francis J. Schnugg et al., Individually and as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of John Schnugg, Deceased, et al., Appellants, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 617 · caselaw · US
General
George V. Hartmann et al., Respondents, v. Francis J. Schnugg et al., Individually and as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of John Schnugg, Deceased, et al., Appellants
188 N.Y. 617·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George V. Hartmann et al., Respondents, v. Francis J. Schnugg et al., Individually and as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of John Schnugg, Deceased, et al., Appellants.
(Argued April 24, 1907;
decided May 10, 1907.)
Hartmann v. Schnugg, 113 App. Div. 254, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in. the first judicial department, entered May 23,1906,affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered' upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action for an accounting.
Joseph Rosenzweig for appellants.
Edward 8. Clinch for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett-and Hiscook, JJ.