Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mark A. CHRISTESON, Applicant v. Don ROPER, Warden., 2014 — 135 S. Ct. 14 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Mark A. CHRISTESON, Applicant v. Don ROPER, Warden.
135 S. Ct. 14190 L. Ed. 2d 322·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mark A. CHRISTESON, Applicant
v.
Don ROPER, Warden.
No. 14A445 14-6873.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 28, 2014.
ORDER
[MAJORITY]
UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicant and the response filed thereto,
IT IS ORDERED that the parties are directed to file supplemental briefs by 2:00 pm today, October, 28, 2014, regarding whether the record shows that petitioner has authorized Attorney Jennifer A. Merrigan, or Attorney John R. Mills, or Attorney Joseph J. Perkovich to move on his behalf for substitution of counsel appointed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599.