Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, et al., 1953 — 345 U.S. 933 · caselaw · US
General
Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, et al.
345 U.S. 933·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 614.
Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, et al.
Charles F. Short, Jr. and Miller Walton for petitioner.
Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, M. H. Black-shear, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General, and Lamar W. Sizemore, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is granted limited to question 1 presented by the petition for the writ, i. e.:
“1. Is mandamus an appropriate remedy to vacate the order of severance and transfer as an unwarranted renunciation of jurisdiction which would compel needless duplicity of trials and appeals to enforce the right to a single trial against all defendants in a proper forum?”