Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Julius Freiberg et al., Respondents, v. Rosanna Branigan, Appellant, 1880 — 82 N.Y. 627 · caselaw · US
General
Julius Freiberg et al., Respondents, v. Rosanna Branigan, Appellant
82 N.Y. 627·New York Court of Appeals·1880·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julius Freiberg et al., Respondents, v. Rosanna Branigan, Appellant.
(Argued October 13, 1880 ;
decided November 9, 1880.)
Reported below (18 Hun, 344).
Thomas Nolan for appellant.
Wm. Montgomery, Jr., for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agrée to affirm without opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.