Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles E. Hubbell et al., Appellants, v. Daniel Buhler et al., Respondents, Impleaded, etc., et al., Appellants, 1889 — 113 N.Y. 653 · caselaw · US
General
Charles E. Hubbell et al., Appellants, v. Daniel Buhler et al., Respondents, Impleaded, etc., et al., Appellants
113 N.Y. 653·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles E. Hubbell et al., Appellants, v. Daniel Buhler et al., Respondents, Impleaded, etc., et al., Appellants.
(Argued March 19, 1889;
decided April 28, 1889.)
Appeal from order of General Term of the Supreme-Court in the fourth judicial department, made November 13, 1888, which reversed in part an order of Special Term upon hearing of exceptions to report of a referee stating accounts, of receiver; also, appeal from an order of said General Term of same date reversing an order of Special Term denying a motion to resettle the order of General Term first appealed, from.
W. G. Tracy for Hubbell et al., appellants.
Payson Merrill for Richards et al., appellants.
A. R.. Dyett for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to reverse on opinion of Williams, J., below.
All concur, except Ruger, Cb. J., who reads for affirmance, and Danforth, J., concurring.
Order reversed.