Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hansen et al. v. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, et al., 1962 — 371 U.S. 901 · caselaw · US
General
Hansen et al. v. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, et al.
371 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 379.
Hansen et al. v. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, et al.
Thomas
F. McKenna, Richard H. Speidel and Joseph A. Sommer for petitioners.
Solicitor General Cox, Roger P. Marquis and Raymond N. Zagone for the Secretary of the Interior, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.