General
Farlin Ball, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Russell B. Biddlecom et al., Executors, etc., Appellants
95 N.Y. 651·New York Court of Appeals·1884·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Farlin Ball, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Russell B. Biddlecom et al., Executors, etc., Appellants.
(Argued January 31, 1884;
decided February 26, 1884.)
This was a reference under the statute of a claim for services.
Wayland F. Ford for appellants.
Watson M. Rogers for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to modify judgment by reducing rate of interest one per cent from January 1, 1880, to September 14, 1881, and to affirm as modified ; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment accordingly.