Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Phœnix Transit Company, Libelant Appellant, v. Steam Lighter C. BLAINE WARNER, Her Engines, etc.; Warner Sugar Refining Company, Claimant Appellee, 1928 — 26 F.2d 1017 · caselaw · US
General
Phœnix Transit Company, Libelant Appellant, v. Steam Lighter C. BLAINE WARNER, Her Engines, etc.; Warner Sugar Refining Company, Claimant Appellee
26 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1928
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Phœnix Transit Company, Libelant Appellant, v. Steam Lighter C. BLAINE WARNER, Her Engines, etc.; Warner Sugar Refining Company, Claimant Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 18, 1928.
No. 315.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Park, Mattison & Lynch, of New York City (Samuel Park and Anthony V. Lynch, Jr., both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Bigham, Englar & Jones, of New York City (Leonard J. Matteson and Richard F. Shaw, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PEE CUEIAM.]
PEE CUEIAM.
Decree affirmed.