Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The Niagara Fruit Company et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 629 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The Niagara Fruit Company et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another
173 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The Niagara Fruit Company et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another.
People v. Niagara Fruit Co., 75 App. Div. 11, affirmed.
(Argued January 26, 1903;
decided February 10, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 22, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
Hiram R. Wood for appellants.
John Cumneen and Edwin H. Risley for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Cullen and Webneb, JJ. Absent: O’Beien, J.