Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
D. B. HEINER, Collector, Appellant, v. BESSEMER COAL & COKE COMPANY, Appellee, 1931 — 47 F.2d 1083 · caselaw · US
Tax
D. B. HEINER, Collector, Appellant, v. BESSEMER COAL & COKE COMPANY, Appellee
47 F.2d 1083·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
D. B. HEINER, Collector, Appellant, v. BESSEMER COAL & COKE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 4368.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
March 4, 1931.
Louis Edward Graham, U. S. Atty., and John A. McCann, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Lester L. Gibson, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.
W. W. Booth, Smith, Shaw, McClay & Seifert, and Maynard Teall, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and THOMSON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Graham and Foster et al. v. Goodcell, 282 U. S.-, 51 S. Ct. 186, 75 L. Ed.-, and the consent of counsel attached hereto, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said District Court [39 F.(2d) 492] in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed.