Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Grover B. ROWLAND et al., Appellants, v. Manila BRADLEY, 1930 — 44 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
Tax
Grover B. ROWLAND et al., Appellants, v. Manila BRADLEY
44 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Grover B. ROWLAND et al., Appellants, v. Manila BRADLEY.
No. 8868.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
July 22, 1930.
Boyle G. Clark and Paul M. Peterson, both of Columbia, Mo., for appellants.
J. A. Walden and C. M. Hulen, both of Moberly, Mo., and Ruby M. Hulen, of Columbia, Mo., and Marion Hulen, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed at costs of appellants, but without taxation of attorney fee, per stipulation of parties.