Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Joan JEONGALAU v. S. D. SMITH, District Director of Immigration, 1932 — 58 F.2d 1086 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Joan JEONGALAU v. S. D. SMITH, District Director of Immigration
58 F.2d 1086·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Joan JEONGALAU v. S. D. SMITH, District Director of Immigration.
No. 4790.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
May 27, 1932.
William B. Rosczyk, of East Chicago, Ind., for appellant.
Oliver M. Loomis, U. S. Atty., of South Bend, Ind., for appellee.
Before ALSCHULER, PAGE, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel for appellee it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that this cause be docketed in this court, and that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed. It is further ordered that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.