Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henslee, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Union Planters Bank & Trust Co. et al.; Fogel v. United States, 1948 — 335 U.S. 811 · caselaw · US
Tax
Henslee, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Union Planters Bank & Trust Co. et al.; Fogel v. United States
335 U.S. 811·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 90.
No. 116.
Henslee, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Union Planters Bank & Trust Co. et al. Fogel v. United States.
Solicitor General Perlman for petitioner in No. 90. Maury Hughes for petitioner in No. 116. Roane Waring for respondents in No. 90. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States in No. 116.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir.; and
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.
Reported below: No. 90, 166 F. 2d 993; No. 116, 167 F. 2d 763.