Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frances Vail, Respondent, v. Elizabeth A. Vail, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1889 — 117 N.Y. 621 · caselaw · US
General
Frances Vail, Respondent, v. Elizabeth A. Vail, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
117 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frances Vail, Respondent, v. Elizabeth A. Vail, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued October 8, 1889;
decided October 15, 1889.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made May 24, 1889, which reversed a final judgment of partition, entered upon a.n order confirming report of commissioners and ordered a new trial.
J. Hampden Dougherty for motion.
D. M. Porter opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motion; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.