Contracts · MBE-tested
Sutherland et al. v. Illinois
418 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1974
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice White, Mr. Justice Blackmun, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist dissent and, without further briefing and oral argument, would affirm the judgment.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 73-380.
Sutherland et al. v. Illinois.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from App. Ct. Ill., 3d Dist. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Spence v. Washington, ante, p. 405, and Smith v. Goguen, 415 U. S. 566 (1974).
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice White, Mr. Justice Blackmun, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist dissent and, without further briefing and oral argument, would affirm the judgment.