Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States Trust Company of New York, as Substituted Trustee, etc., Appellant, v. Philip V. R. Stanton, Impleaded, etc., Respondent, 1895 — 145 N.Y. 620 · caselaw · US
General
United States Trust Company of New York, as Substituted Trustee, etc., Appellant, v. Philip V. R. Stanton, Impleaded, etc., Respondent
145 N.Y. 620·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
United States Trust Company of New York, as Substituted Trustee, etc., Appellant, v. Philip V. R. Stanton, Impleaded, etc., Respondent.
(Argued March 5, 1895;
decided March 19, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 12, 1894, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term, dismissed the complaint and awarded final judgment in favor of defendant.
Edward W. Sheldon, for appellant.
Josiah T. Marean, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on the defense of the Statute of Limitations ; no opinion.
All concur, except Gray and Bartlett, JJ., dissenting. Judgment affirmed.