Corporations
WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.
364 U.S. 518·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. · Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the opinion that the motion to affirm should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 484.
Decided December 19, 1960.
George B. Turner and Philip H. Strubing for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon and Bernard M. Hollander for the United States, and Bernard G. Segal, Samuel D. Slade, Robert L. Werner and Thomas E. Ervin for Radio Corporation of America and National Broadcasting Co., Inc., appellees. .
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the opinion that the motion to affirm should be granted.