Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Electric Bond & Share Co. et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al., 1938 — 303 U.S. 617 · caselaw · US
Securities
Electric Bond & Share Co. et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al.
303 U.S. 617·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 636.
Electric Bond & Share Co. et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al.
January 31, 1938.
[MAJORITY]
Jerome N. Frank and John W. Hanes, members of the Securities and Exchange Commission, substituted as parties respondent in the place of James M. Landis and James D. Ross, resigned, on motion of Assistant Solicitor General Bell in that behalf.