General
Department of Fish and Game of California v. Federal Power Commission et al.; and Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission
379 U.S. 969·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 648.
No. 659.
Department of Fish and Game of California v. Federal Power Commission et al.; and Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission.
Thomas C. Lynch,- Attorney General of California, Charles E. Corker, Assistant Attorney General, and Burton J. Gindler and Ralph W. Scott, Deputy Attorneys General, for petitioner in No. 648. Gregory A. Harrison and Malcolm T. Dungan for petitioner in No. 659. Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Josephine H. Klein for. the Federal Power Commission. Briefs of amici curiae, in support of the-petition in No. 648, were filed for their respective States by John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Joseph L. Coniff, Mike Johnston and Dennis G. Seinfeld, Assistant Attorneys General; Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Roy C. Atchison,. Assistant Attorney General; and Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 333 F. 2d 689.