Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sarah Markey, Respondent, v. Eugene A. Brewster, Executor, etc,, Appellant, 1877 — 70 N.Y. 607 · caselaw · US
General
Sarah Markey, Respondent, v. Eugene A. Brewster, Executor, etc,, Appellant
70 N.Y. 607·New York Court of Appeals·1877·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah Markey, Respondent, v. Eugene A. Brewster, Executor, etc,, Appellant.
(Argued June 7, 1877 ;
decided June 19, 1877.)
Reported below, 10 Hun, 16.
W. C. Anthony, for appellant.
G. Hill, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm order granting new trial on opinion of court below, and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on stipulation.
All concur.
Order affirmed, and judgment accordingly.