Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States et al. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., 1967 — 386 U.S. 1002 · caselaw · US
General
United States et al. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.
386 U.S. 1002·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 23.
United States et al. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.
Walter R. McDonald on the motion.
[For earlier actions herein, see 383 U. S. 964, 384 U. S. 888.]
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. S. D. Cal. Motion of Southern Governors’ Conference et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, granted.